![]() ![]() On the contrary, it seems that all these items are embedded in a large and complex network as sets of tools that, in a healthy combination, decide upon the degree of success of an orator’s speech and make speech delivery ‘happen’. Such an analytical approach does not, in any way, neglect the idea that non-linguistic patterns of behaviour, such as facial expressions, gestures, or eye movements as decisive components of body language are entirely autonomous features to be treated separately from notions of textuality. ![]() the use of loudspeakers and cameras, the aim of this term paper is to outline the relationship between three different items (two of which are of a linguistic and one of a social nature), that is, the liaison between rhetorical devices-cohesion/coherence, -and- emotionality. Regardless of the great relevance of linguistic features such as aspects of phonology or the impact of technical terminology, e.g. reactions of the audience, audio-visual signs etc.). ![]() Had they not sustained a heightened level of attentiveness, his audiences would have been incapable of participating in the vibrant manner so typical of southern black congregations.” (Atkinson 1984: 108) Considering most of Atkinson’s analytical descriptions and suggestions of Martin Luther King’s activist speeches, it can be well observed that the author includes not only explanations on the ‘text-intern’ level but also characterizations on linguistic as well as non-linguistic criteria beyond the written textual zone (e.g. They must also therefore have had to concentrate very closely on everything he said. “To perform their part in the dialogue, King’s audiences must have been continually on the look-out for opportunities to respond. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |